Another Spectrum

Personal ramblings and rants of a somewhat twisted mind


Leave a comment

Unspoken Turns

I’ve always struggled with knowing when it is my turn to speak. I wrote about it six years ago in my post To speak or not to speak, that is the question. An event several weeks ago drove home to me quite forcefully that I still find the art of conversation elusive – very elusive. It was frustrating enough for me to want to write about it, but try as I may it didn’t convey the frustration that I felt. I enlisted the help of Copilot, but I still couldn’t get away from the article seeming like a ball-by-ball play of the situation instead of being about how I felt. After a lot of back and forth conversation, Copilot suggested a poem might be a better platform for expressing how I felt. So after an hour or so of collaboration, here’s the final result. Let me know in the comments how the poem resonates with you.


Unspoken Turns
In the crowded theatre of conversation,
I sit, a silent actor on life’s stage,
The script eluding my grasp,
As others pirouette through dialogue.

To speak or not to speak?
A riddle whispered by invisible muses,
Their laughter echoing in my ears,
As I fumble for cues, lost in the spotlight.

One-on-one, I stumble—
Words tripping over each other,
A clumsy waltz of syllables,
And the lead remains elusive.

But in the ensemble of many,
I am a fish out of water,
Caught in the undertow of turn-taking,
Gasping for air, seeking my moment.

To speak or not to speak?
A soliloquy etched upon my soul,
As I watch the choreography unfold,
Wondering when my cue will come.

ESP or supernatural whispers?
The others glide seamlessly,
Their voices weaving patterns,
While I unravel the threads of silence.

To speak or not to speak?
A silent plea to the cosmic director,
Who withholds the script,
Leaving me adrift in this conversational sea.

And so, I observe—seven decades and counting,
A detective of human interaction,
Yet the clues remain cryptic,
The secret handshake of discourse eluding me.

Next time you witness rudeness,
An untimely interruption,
Consider the hidden struggle,
The desperate quest to belong.

For we, the speechless wanderers,
Navigate your world with uncertainty,
Our turns unmarked, our cues obscured,
Yet yearning to dance in the spotlight.


12 Comments

Progress!

I notice here in Aotearoa that there is a trend away from referring to April as Autism Awareness Month. Even a trend away from naming it Autism Acceptance Month. Instead I see a new trend towards referring to April as Autism Appreciation Month. May the rend continue.

While autistic people do face many challenges living in a society built around the needs and wants of neurotypical people, we can also offer unique perspectives and skills that can benefit a diverse and accepting society.


13 Comments

Autism research: Nothing about us without us

In the realm of autism research, a disconcerting pattern emerges: autistic individuals are often treated more like subjects in a laboratory experiment than as intelligent contributors capable of shaping and conducting research. Our voices are rarely sought, and our active participation in studies is infrequent. This approach inadvertently pathologises autistic individuals, excluding us as if our perspectives hold no value. However, it is crucial to recognise that those most adept at expressing an authentic autistic viewpoint are we, the autistic community.

Imagine a parallel scenario in any other field of research: excluding the very group under study from shaping the discourse. Such exclusion would be deemed unacceptable, undermining the fundamental principles of rigorous inquiry and equitable representation. Therefore, it is imperative that researchers actively involve autistic individuals in research, recognising our unique insights and contributions as essential to advancing the understanding of autism and fostering a more inclusive scientific community.

To transform this exclusionary approach in autism research, researchers must actively embrace a more inclusive and collaborative model. Here are some essential steps:

  1. Autistic Representation: Involve autistic individuals at every stage of research, from conceptualisation to implementation. Our lived experiences provide invaluable insights that can shape research questions, methodologies, and outcomes.
  2. Co-Design Research: Adopt a co-design approach where autistic individuals collaborate with researchers. Together, we can identify relevant topics, design studies, and interpret findings. This ensures that research aligns with the needs and priorities of the autistic community.
  3. Community Engagement: Establish meaningful connections with autistic communities. Attend conferences, workshops, and support groups. Listen to our stories, concerns, and aspirations. Engage in dialogue to build trust and foster genuine partnerships.
  4. Accessible Communication: Use clear, jargon-free language in research materials. Provide accessible formats (such as visual aids or plain language summaries) to enhance understanding. Autistic individuals should be able to access and comprehend study information easily.
  5. Ethical Inclusion: Prioritize ethical considerations. Obtain informed consent, respect autonomy, and protect privacy. Ensure that research protocols are respectful and considerate of individual differences.
  6. Diverse Research Teams: Assemble interdisciplinary teams that include autistic researchers, clinicians, educators, and advocates. Diverse perspectives enrich research and challenge biases.
  7. Dissemination and Advocacy: Disseminate research findings in formats accessible to the autistic community. Collaborate with advocacy organizations to amplify voices and advocate for policy changes based on evidence.
  8. Challenge Stereotypes: Address stereotypes and misconceptions about autism. Research should highlight strengths, resilience, and diverse abilities rather than perpetuating deficit-based narratives.
  9. Funding Priorities: Allocate research funding to projects that actively involve autistic individuals. Support initiatives that empower self-advocacy and community-driven research.
  10. Shift Paradigms: Recognize that autistic individuals are experts in their own lives. Their contributions are not just valuable; they are essential for advancing knowledge and promoting inclusivity.

By embracing these principles, researchers can create a research landscape that celebrates neurodiversity, respects autonomy, and fosters meaningful collaboration.


4 Comments

Autism Speaks (but not for autistics)

Autism Speaks, despite its prominence as a major autism advocacy and research organisation, has faced significant criticism from autistic self-advocates. Let’s delve into the objections raised by the autistic community:

  1. Viewing Autism as a Disease:
    • Autism Speaks was founded on the premise that autism is a disease that needs to be cured. Their original mission statement reflected this perspective.
    • Most autistic self-advocates emphasise that autism is not a disease but rather a natural variation in neurotype. We advocate for acceptance rather than seeking a cure.
  2. Stigmatization and Discrimination:
    • By framing autism as a problem to be fixed, Autism Speaks inadvertently contributes to stigma and discrimination against autistic individuals.
    • This portrayal reinforces the idea that there is something inherently wrong with autistic people, perpetuating harmful stereotypes.
  3. Lack of Autistic Representation:
    • Autism Speaks is primarily led by non-autistic parents of autistic children. This lack of authentic representation is a major concern.
    • Autistic self-advocates argue that an advocacy organisation without autistic voices is akin to a whites-only group addressing racism or a men-only panel discussing sexism.
  4. “I Am Autism” Video:
    • One of the most criticised aspects is Autism Speaks’ “I Am Autism” promotional video.
    • In this video, autism is portrayed as an enemy, causing fear and perpetuating negative stereotypes. Many found it deeply offensive and dehumanizing.
  5. Focus on Difficulties Over Possibilities:
    • Autism Speaks tends to emphasise the deficits and challenges associated with autism rather than celebrating the unique strengths and possibilities of autistic lives3.
  6. Financial Allocation:
    • Critics point out that only a small fraction of Autism Speaks’ budget goes toward direct services for autistic individuals and families.
    • Less than 1/3 of 1% of their budget is allocated to the “Family Service” grants that fund services.
  7. Autism Acceptance vs. Awareness:
    • Autistic self-advocates prefer a shift from mere awareness to autism acceptance. We advocate for understanding, inclusion, and celebrating autistic achievements.

In summary, while Autism Speaks aims to raise awareness and provide support, its approach has sparked controversy due to its framing of autism, lack of authentic representation, and focus on difficulties rather than possibilities.

Sources used in preparing this post:


11 Comments

Coming soon: Autism Awareness Day (and month)

Like many Autistic people I have mixed feelings about Autism Awareness Day (April 2nd) and the entire month of April being designated as Autism Awareness Month. Every Autistic person will have their own reasons, but here are my reasons behind the discomfort:

  1. Simplification and Stereotypes:
    • Awareness campaigns often oversimplify autism, perpetuating stereotypes and focusing solely on deficits or challenges.
    • I prefer a more nuanced understanding that recognises our diverse experiences, strengths, and contributions.
  2. Pathologisation vs. Acceptance:
    • I feel that awareness efforts tend to pathologise autism, framing it as a disorder to be fixed or cured.
    • Autistic self-advocates prefer to emphasise acceptance over awareness, advocating for understanding and embracing neurodiversity.
  3. Lack of Autistic Voices:
    • Awareness campaigns often feature non-autistic voices, leaving out the perspectives of those directly affected.
    • We want our voices heard, because only we can provide authentic insights into their own lives.
  4. Focus on Pity or Fear:
    • Some awareness initiatives evoke pity or fear, emphasising the challenges faced by autistic people.
    • Autistic advocates such as myself prefer a focus on empowerment, highlighting achievements and celebrating neurodiversity.
  5. Critique of “Light It Up Blue”:
    • The tradition of lighting landmarks blue on Autism Awareness Day has faced criticism From the autistic community.
    • The colour blue perpetuates an outdated concept that autism is primarily a “boy” problem. In reality, autism affects people of all genders, including girls and non-binary individuals.
    • Autism Speaks, the organisation behind the campaign (and considered a “hate group” by many autistic self advocates), originally focused on finding a “cure” for autism. We prefer to emphasise acceptance rather than seeking a cure.
    • The blue campaign oversimplifies autism, emphasising deficits and challenges rather than recognising the diverse experiences and strengths of autistic individuals.
    • The campaign lacks representation of autistic voices and perspectives. Authentic insights from those directly affected are essential for meaningful awareness efforts.
  6. Autism Acceptance vs. Awareness:
    • Many autistic individuals and organisations promote Autism Acceptance Month instead.
    • This shift emphasises understanding, inclusion, and celebrating autistic achievements.

In summary, while awareness efforts have their place, we as autistic people seek a more inclusive, respectful, and informed approach that recognises our unique perspectives and strengths.


2 Comments

Being autistic in a neuronormative world

I am not a puzzle to be solved
I am not a problem to be fixed
I am not a disorder to be cured
But I am a person to be understood

You study me like a specimen
You test me like a machine
You observe me like a stranger
But you never talk to me

You think you know what's best for me
You think you can speak for me
You think you can change me
But you never listen to me

You ignore my voice and my choice
You dismiss my feelings and my needs
You devalue my identity and my dignity
And you never respect me

I am not your research subject
I am not your charity case
I am not your burden
But I am your equal

I have a voice and a vision
I have a passion and a purpose
I have a life and a story
And I want to share them with you


3 Comments

“I feel your pain”

I have had that comment made to me on several occasions following a blog post I’ve published, or in response to a comment I have made on someone else’s blog, and many more time in face to face contact. This always amazes me because they seem to feel something I don’t. I’ve often wondered why they make such a claim. Is it because they wish to indicate empathy? If so, why not simply tell of a similar personal experience? Or is it because in my telling of the story, you do, in some way, sense something that makes you feel some sort of pain – as if it had actually happened to you?

At one time I used to think that “I feel your pain” was just a meaningless expression used by people to indicate that they have been listening, but have no intention of making a practical response. But in the years since I discovered I’m autistic I’ve learnt that many people do actually experience some kind of emotional pain that they perceive others have experienced, even if the other person hasn’t. Perhaps a better way of explaining it is that they feel an emotional pain that they would experience if the situation relayed in the retelling had occurred to them.

In telling a story about a situation that would have been better had it not happened, that is exactly what I am telling – an event/situation that should not have happened. As far as I’m aware knowing that something should not have happened does not mean that somehow I should experience some sort of emotional pain. It’s not about me personally, it’s about wrongness of the event/situation. It shapes my ethics and morality and is shaped by my ethics and morality.

I’m going to ramble just a little more before I get to the point. Architects and others involved in the design of social gathering places such as shopping malls, pedestrian precincts, and theatres design them to attract people. And on the whole that is precisely what they do. But some people – many autistics for example – are hypersensitive to the sights, sounds and activity that occurs in such places. Instead of being desirable places they become disorientating places of pain and discomfort, triggering our fight, flight or freeze instinct. And yet when we describe what we experience in such locations, the typical response is to dismiss it as if we’re simply imagining or exaggerating what we experience – it’s not actually real.

Occasionally I will open up to others about how I experience aspects of the world around us differently from them, exposing a vulnerability that another might perceive as a weakness. Often others will express sympathy and indicate that they understand, but usually they don’t. A typical example might be after I explain how unpleasant a shopping mall can be they express something like “I hear ya. They’re noisy places aren’t they?” and then in the next breath, invite me to join them for lunch or coffee in a shopping mall food court so that they can learn more about autism! When I protest that I have just explained how such places are so unpleasant and I’d prefer to eat somewhere else where there’s less noise, commotion, and harsh lighting they respond by suggesting I simply relax, ignore the surroundings and enjoy the food. And besides it’s not really that noisy and bright anyway!

The avoiding of eye and physical contact

My whānau is of the hugging kind, and like to hug when we meet and greet, and when we say our goodbyes. I however, do not, and instinctively tense up whenever I’m embraced. It’s unpleasant and I’ll attempt to escape as quickly as I can. Most, if not all of my family are aware that I dislike hugging, but nevertheless, every time we meet I am hugged by each and every family member! Even though it might be more brief and less intimate than with others in the whānau, it is still very unpleasant. They might as well whack me over the head with a sand filled sock. I don’t think it would feel any worse. And then it’s supposed to be repeated when we eventually go our separate ways!

I have only ever once spoken publicly about being autistic, during which I explained why I find eye contact, hugs and handshakes so unpleasant. It was an impromptu, unplanned occasion and I managed to stumble my way through around ten minutes of describing my experiences. After I had spoken, several people came up to me to say they gained a new insight into how autism affects people and then attempted to shake my hand. Usually when someone wishes to shake my hand I comply as attempts to avoid a handshake are invariably misconstrued as some form of hostility. However, as I had only moments before explained why I find a handshake was so unpleasant, I felt I was justified in making it clear I did not want to do it by deliberately putting my hand behind my back when they presented their hand. For one person there was clearly a light-bulb moment, and they apologised for their thoughtlessness. Although I’m poor at reading facial expressions and body language, it was rather obvious that another was offended by the withdrawal of my hand, and as she left in a huff I heard her say comment to her friend “How rude! Are all autistic sufferers like that?” and her friend saying “Yeah, they don’t care about being rude. They can’t empathise – they’re only interested in themselves”.

The reason? I can only suppose that it’s not possible for neurotypical people to put themselves into a uniquely autistic situation. Were the circumstances or situation is somewhat similar to what they have experienced previously, most people seem to be able the empathise with my experience and then project their emotional response that they feel onto me. But when a uniquely autistic experience is explained to them, they cannot empathise and dismiss my experience as inconsequential.

Here’s the rub: every time I interact with someone it must be on neurotypical terms. It’s all well and good to say I should be more assertive or to stand up for myself, but doing so is almost always counter productive. As in the example of the woman and her friend above, even when it’s known that the reason I do some things or avoid some things is because I’m autistic, there is still an assumption that it’s an anti-social choice on my part because autistic people are anti-social and/or only interested in themselves and don’t really care about the feelings of others. And if the other party is unaware that I’m autistic, an assertive stance on my part is invariably perceived as hostility, a personal insult, or worse, deserving of an “appropriate” counter response. Sometimes that includes violence.

In the first paragraph above, I wrote “If so, why not simply tell of a similar personal experience?” This is what I and many autistic people do to show our empathy. It’s in the sharing that we demonstrate our empathy. It’s usually misinterpreted by non-autistics as being an attempt to draw attention to oneself, of being self-centred. Be honest, was that what you thought when you read that sentence for the first time? Perhaps It might be better to pretend I empathise emotionally by lying – to say “I feel your pain” even though I don’t. But like most lies, it will eventually be found out, and I don’t know of anyone who doesn’t feel hurt and/or betrayed when they discover they have been lied to.


9 Comments

So, I’m becoming curmudgeonly in my old age

I’m not one for demanding others live as I do, in fact I really appreciate the diversity of the human condition. And I don’t mind how others celebrate the bringing in of a new year. As Aotearoa is the first nation in the world to bring in the New Year (if one excludes from tiny Kiribati, population 120,000), perhaps we have more reason than others to celebrate. But what I don’t appreciate is how obtrusive some folk are when they celebrate.

Fireworks can be purchased by the general public only on a few days before November 5 each year. I won’t go into the reason why here, but there seems to be a trend away from lighting them on that day, which more often than not is wet and windy, and instead putting them in storage until New Year’s Eve. Then on the stroke of midnight setting them off terrifying pets and waking the neighbourhood.

Apart from the hazards of storing gunpowder in one’s house or garage for almost two months, have any of the folk who celebrate the New Year by letting off fireworks at midnight thought about how it affects animals and humans? I really don’t appreciate being woken at that time by the sounds of exploding fireworks. Nor does our cat Frankie. Admittedly from our home perched at the top of a hill overlooking our township, the spectacle is quite amazing to watch, and if I’d been awake at that time I might have actually enjoyed it. But I wasn’t and I didn’t.

At the time of publishing, this post, the New Year arrived 12 hours and 6 minutes ago, but i’m still feeling no better now than I did when rudely woken at midnight.


5 Comments

Fossil of the day

Sigh, the true colours of our newly elected right-of-centre coalition government are beginning to show.

New Zealand has picked up the less-than-coveted “fossil of the day” title at this year’s COP28 climate summit.

The “award” is given each day at the conference to a country deemed to be “doing the most to achieve the least” or “doing their best to be the worst” in terms of the progress in the climate negotiations and climate action.

In this case, New Zealand has been given the title over the government’s plans to reverse the ban on offshore oil and gas exploration.

As Newsroom reported, the government was said to be making “a U-turn on the way to a liveable future,” according to the award’s founder the Climate Action Network, which made the award.

Dr Kayla Kingdon-Bebb, chief executive of the World Wide Fund for Nature NZ, said the new government was achieving international recognition for all the wrong reasons.

“The science is unequivocal that fossil fuels need to stay in the ground. Reopening the door to offshore oil and gas exploration in the middle of a climate crisis is not only irresponsible, but makes us an embarrassment on the world stage,” Kingdon-Bebb said.

“We’ve already heard concerns from our neighbours in the Pacific and our trading partners won’t react kindly either if New Zealand doesn’t play its part in the global response to climate change.

“I urge the Government to wake up to the calls of the international community and abandon this ill-thought-out decision.”


An embarrassment’: NZ picks up ‘award’ for offshore oil ‘U-turn’


6 Comments

Benefits of the New Zealand universal no-fault accident compensation scheme

This is a short essay on the benefits of the New Zealand universal no-fault accident compensation scheme created with the assistance of AI. Personally I would like to see the scheme extended to include all matters of health and disability as we currently have a two-tier system: those who suffer loss through illness or disease do not receive the same level of support as those who suffer loss through accident. But that’s another topic for another day.

New Zealand is one of the few countries in the world that has a universal no-fault accident compensation scheme, which covers all personal injuries caused by accidents, regardless of who is at fault. The scheme, which is administered by the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC), provides various benefits to injured people, such as treatment and rehabilitation costs, income replacement, lump-sum payments, and support for dependants. In exchange, people give up their right to sue for damages, except in rare cases of reckless conduct. The scheme is funded by general taxation and levies on employers, earners, and motorists.

The benefits of the New Zealand universal no-fault accident compensation scheme are manifold. First, it provides timely and adequate compensation to a greater number of injured people than a tort system, which is often costly, lengthy, and uncertain. According to Bismark and Paterson², the ACC system is simple and easy to navigate, with straightforward claims processed in weeks and all decisions made within nine months. The compensation awards are also consistent and fair, as they are based on a fixed schedule that ensures similar injuries receive similar compensation. Moreover, the system is remarkably affordable, as it has low administrative costs and avoids the expenses of litigation and insurance premiums.

Second, the scheme promotes community responsibility and solidarity, as it is based on the principle that everyone contributes to and benefits from a common pool of resources. The scheme reflects the social contract between the state and its citizens, as well as the mutual obligations among citizens. As Duncan¹ argues, the scheme embeds a sense of collective responsibility for preventing and mitigating the impact of injury, as well as a sense of collective entitlement to receive support and care when injured. The scheme also fosters a culture of trust and cooperation, as it reduces the adversarial and blame-oriented nature of a tort system.

Third, the scheme enhances provider accountability and patient safety, as it has mechanisms to address the quality and performance of health services and professionals. The scheme does not absolve providers from their ethical and legal duties, but rather encourages them to report and learn from adverse events, without fear of litigation. The scheme also works in tandem with the Health and Disability Commissioner, who is responsible for promoting patients’ rights, resolving complaints, and initiating disciplinary proceedings in serious cases. Furthermore, the scheme supports research and education on injury prevention and safety improvement, as well as incentives and regulations to reduce the risk and severity of injury.

In conclusion, the New Zealand universal no-fault accident compensation scheme is a unique and innovative system that offers many benefits to injured people, health providers, and society as a whole. The scheme provides comprehensive and fair compensation, fosters community responsibility and solidarity, and enhances provider accountability and patient safety. The scheme is widely accepted and supported by the public, and has been recognised as a model for other countries to emulate.

Source: Conversation with Bing, 3 November 2023
(1) No-Fault Compensation in New Zealand: Harmonizing Injury Compensation …. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/journal-article/2006/feb/no-fault-compensation-new-zealand-harmonizing-injury.
(2) New Zealand’s universal no-fault accident compensation scheme …. https://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/n5314/pdf/ch14.pdf.
(3) Injuries we cover – ACC. https://www.acc.co.nz/im-injured/what-we-cover/injuries-we-cover/.
(4) No-fault, no difference: no-fault compensation for medical injury and …. https://bjgp.org/content/67/654/38.