Americans have a long, rich history of having a really weird relationship with sex. They indulge in two unique assertions: nudity is inherently sexual, and sex is somehow more objectionable than violence. The rest of the world just doesn’t understand these notions.
A recent NZ poll surveyed how a range of the attributes of political leaders would affect the party vote of those polled. The attributes in question were sexual orientation, age, ethnicity, gender, union affiliation and religious beliefs.
The ethnicity and gender, were not significant factors for the majority of those polled, whereas age and strong religious beliefs were.
Attribute
Total*
More likely
to vote
Less likely
to vote
No
difference
Don’t know
/ Refused
Of a different ethnicity to you
100
3
8
88
1
Of the same ethnicity to you
100
10
2
87
1
A woman
100
11
3
85
0
Gay (homosexual or lesbian)
100
2
20
77
1
Immigrant to NZ
100
2
34
60
3
Strong links to a union
100
11
32
53
3
Strong religious beliefs
100
7
41
48
3
Over 75 years old
100
4
59
36
1
*In some instances the total may not add up to 100 exactly due to rounding
It’s interesting to observe that only 20% of voters would be influenced negatively by a political leader being gay, whereas 48% would be influenced negatively by the leader having strong religious views. It’s pleasing to see that one’s ethnicity, gender and sexual orientation will have little bearing on one’s political standing.
I am surprised by the fact that being an immigrant might affect one’s chances at the polls. We are somewhat more xenophobic than I thought. Thankfully our constitution does not prohibit immigrants standing for the top political job in this country.
I wonder how these results compare to other parts of the world?
The survey was conducted by Research New Zealand using a nationally-representative sample of approximately 500 New Zealanders over 18.